You need Javascript enabled for this to work
Logo for Center for Personal Assistance Services New Browser Window, University of California, San Francisco  
Jump over main navigation bar to the sub navigation barHome (press control H in some browsers)Current directory is Need for PAS (press control N in some browsers)Home and Community PAS (press control C in some browsers)Workers and Caregivers (press control W in some browsers)Economics and Workplace PAS (press control E in some browsers)Emergency Preparedness (press control P in some browsers)PAS Users (press control U in some browsers) 
Jump over the sub navigation bar to the main body content

State Information

Institutional Services

All Center Information by Audience

PAS Center Publications

Library

Center Presentations

Links

Webcasts

Policy & Legislation

Health Care Reform

State of the Science Conference

Center Newsletter

PAS Events Calendar

Center News Items

About the Center

 PHI

  Jump over the main body content to the main navigation bar 		 

Printer-friendly page

Mittal, V., Rosen, J. & Leana, C. (2009). A dual-driver model of retention and turnover in the direct care workforce. Gerontologist, 49(5), pp.623-634.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to understand the factors associated with turnover and retention of direct care workers. We hypothesize that a dual-driver model that includes individual factors, on-the-job factors, off-the-job factors, and contextual factors can be used to distinguish between reasons for direct care workforces (DCWs) staying on the job or leaving the job.

Design and Methods: We conducted 7 focus groups with 47 participants. We identified key themes they used to describe their experiences focusing on differences between stayers (had been in the same job for at least 3 years) and leavers (had changed jobs within the past 3 years).

Results: Five major themes associated with turnover were identified as follows: (a) lack of respect, (b) inadequate management, (c) work or family conflicts, (d) difficulty of the work, and (e) job openings. Themes associated with retention were as follows: (a) being "called" to service, (b) patient advocacy, (c) personal relationships with residents, (d) religion or spirituality, (e) haven from home problems, and (f) flexibility. Themes associated with turnover were different from those associated with retention.

Implications: DCW turnover and retention are complex, multifactorial issues. Efforts to stabilize the DCW must address the issues associated with retention as well as those associated with turnover. Specifically, factors that promote retention may be qualitatively different than those that prevent turnover. Treating retention and turnover as simply the obverse of each other may be misleading in addressing the underlying problem of job stability among DCWs (abstract from: http://gerontologist.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/49/5/623).

Obtain the Full Version

Subscription information:
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/geront/access_purchase/price_list.html