Center for Personal Assistance Services University of California, San Francisco  
Jump over persistant main navigation to the sub navigationHome (press control H in some browsers)Formal and Informal PAS (press control F in some browsers)Home and Community PAS (press control C in some browsers)PAS Workforce (press control W in some browsers)Workplace PAS (press control O in some browsers)PAS Users (press control U in some browsers)  
Jump over the changing body navigation to the persistant top navigation

Printer-friendly page

State Information > Ohio Olmstead Decision Information> Ohio Olmstead and Olmstead Related Cases

Ohio Olmstead and Olmstead Related Cases map of Ohio

As of January 2005

The Center for PAS has tracked 2 Olmstead related cases in Ohio.

This information is extracted from the "Olmstead and Olmstead-Related Lawsuits" table in the "Introduction to Olmstead Lawsuits and Olmstead Plans" report published on the center for PAS website.

Martin et al v. Taft et al

Date filed: 1989
Case status: Open
Primary Target group:
Case Type (Olmstead e or Related f): Olmstead
Reference (on the Olmstead & Olmstead-related Lawsuits table) : OH13
Case Summary & Links to Further Details iii:
Summary Complaint that the state fails to provide integrated residential services to all eligible people with developmental disabilities. Progress Settlement reached, but not accepted due to public outcry from people arguing that it would undermine entitlement to ICR/MR services. Further Details [http://www.opra.org]

Nickolaus Thompson & Ohio Provider Resource Association et al v. Hayes et al

Date filed: Jun. 2003
Case status: Closed (Sep 2003)
Primary Target group:
Case Type (Olmstead e or Related f): Related
Reference (on the Olmstead & Olmstead-related Lawsuits table) : OH23
Case Summary & Links to Further Details iii:
Summary Case (brought by private providers of services for people with developmental disabilities) alleging the state is not ensuring that Medicaid services are administered uniformly across counties. Progress The Court ordered providers to either make new, mutual contracts or continue to operate under existing contracts until agreement was reached with the counties. CMS (Sep 2003) was asked to give technical assistance to facilitate the change in contracting rules. Further details [http://www.opra.org] ('what's new'section)

Select from Map
Button: Map of the 50 US states. Choose another state for page.
OR
Select from List