Center for Personal Assistance Services University of California, San Francisco  
Jump over persistant main navigation to the sub navigationHome (press control H in some browsers)Formal and Informal PAS (press control F in some browsers)Home and Community PAS (press control C in some browsers)PAS Workforce (press control W in some browsers)Workplace PAS (press control O in some browsers)PAS Users (press control U in some browsers)  
Jump over the changing body navigation to the persistant top navigation

Printer-friendly page

State Information > Oregon Olmstead Decision Information> Oregon Olmstead and Olmstead Related Cases

Oregon Olmstead and Olmstead Related Cases map of Oregon

As of January 2005

The Center for PAS has tracked 3 Olmstead related cases in Oregon.

This information is extracted from the "Olmstead and Olmstead-Related Lawsuits" table in the "Introduction to Olmstead Lawsuits and Olmstead Plans" report published on the center for PAS website.

Staley et al v. Kitzhaber et al

Date filed: Jan. 2000
Case status: Closed (Dec 2000)
Primary Target group:
Case Type (Olmstead e or Related f): Related
Reference (on the Olmstead & Olmstead-related Lawsuits table) : OR13
Case Summary & Links to Further Details iii:
Summary This (non-class action) lawsuit alleged the state was not providing services in the most integrated setting to eligible individuals with developmental disabilities with reasonable promptness. Progress Settlement. Due to changes in state revenues, the court approved a modified settlement proposing a slower rate of expansion & change (to 2011). The state Olmstead plan was the basis for the settlement12. Further details [http://www.oradvocacy.org/staley2003.htm]

Miranda B et al v. Kulongoski et al * (formerly Miranda B v. Kitzhaber et al)

Date filed: Dec. 2000
Case status: Closed (Mar 2004)
Primary Target group:
Case Type (Olmstead e or Related f): Olmstead
Reference (on the Olmstead & Olmstead-related Lawsuits table) : OR23
Case Summary & Links to Further Details iii:
Summary Class action for people residing in a psychiatric hospital despite being assessed as suitable for community placement. The judge rejected the defense that recent state legislation requiring the production of an Olmstead plan protected the state from the lawsuit. Progress Settlement (includes the creation of new community placements & a fund to place people with conditions that are barriers to community reintegration). Further details [http://caselaw.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0135950P.pdf]

Watson et al v. Weeks et al (formerly Watson et al v. Thorne et al)

Date filed: Feb. 2003
Case status: Closed (Aug 2002)
Primary Target group:
Case Type (Olmstead e or Related f): Related
Reference (on the Olmstead & Olmstead-related Lawsuits table) : OR33
Case Summary & Links to Further Details iii:
Summary Case challenging lost eligibility for services after the state narrowed eligibility for long-term care services by raising the threshold for assessed functional impairment necessary to qualify for services. Services have resumed for most levels of need. Progress Case dismissed. Further details [http://www.nsclc.org/news/03/07/appeal_watson.htm]

Select from Map
Button: Map of the 50 US states. Choose another state for page.
OR
Select from List